🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he could survive losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.